Monday, November 29, 2021

Bankston Errata vs Vacher

 page1image40896544   Do Not Copy, or reproduce without contacting Cynthia Forde

Jacob Bankston: son of Lawrence Bankston and Rebecca Hendricks; father of Araminta

Find-A-Grave Memorial ID 86844870
To: Jean Roberts: 
jeanlroberts@comcast.net
From: Myra Vanderpool Gormley myravgormley@gmail.com

and shakingfamilytrees.blogspot.com

From the website:

Jacob Bankston, birth 1731, Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, USA

  •   No evidence is provided for this date and/or place of birth, although few of the Find-a-Grave websites provide any sources/references. It seems to be that only when a correction or suggestion is made that a “source” is required by the submitter.

  •   However, the above information appears to have been taken, directly or indirectly, from A Genealogy of the Bankston (Bankestok) Family,” compiled by Edna Augusta Robertson Vacher and printed in 1947. This 79-page family history manuscript was microfilmed by the Genealogical Society of Utah in 1971 and is available at its Family History Library as Film No. 858672 (item 7). It is now also available online at familysearch.org in digital version — #7814870, starting with image #445 (of 1,044).

  •   In 2013 in Bankston Erratta, the Rev. Dr. Cynthia Forde-Beatty, the Swedes Colonial Society’genealogist, issued a report disproving many of Vacher’s claims and advising researchers to have a healthy skepticism about the accuracy of the genealogy presented in that manuscript and to verify any published material. Additionally, some of Vacher’s genealogy was used in “The Direct Lineage of Young Peter Bankston [Eight Generations, 1640-1878] and The Descendants of Young Peter and Louisa Magee Bankston (Six Generations, 1823-1988),” [hereinafter, Young Peter Bankston] compiled by Jesse Homer Bankston in 1988.

  •   On page 14 of a microfilmed version of her manuscript, Vacher says a Jacob Bankston, son of Lawrence and Rebecca Hendericks [sic] Bankston, was “born in Philadelphia, Pa., abt. 1731, died abt. 1817 in Clark [sic] Co., Ga, He married 1753 to Elinor Cock (Cox).” [No evidence or citation to any reference was provided — see rebuttal below.]

  •   She then listed four children as being their children: John 1754-1823; Elijah 1765-2-22-1849; Elinor [no dates] and Jacob Jr. [no dates] without any evidence for her assertion. She also claimed “Jacob Bankston and his family moved (from Philadelphia) about 1758 to North Carolina where they remained until just before the Revolutionary War, moving on to Wilkes Co., Ga. He enlisted in the Georgia Continental Army and was in the service until the close of the war.” [No proof is provided for a son John, daughter Elinor or a Jacob Jr. (she did not provide any for Elijah, but more recent research has confirmed this kinship — you’ll note there’s no mention of a daughter, Araminta either).

  •   In Young Peter Bankston (p. 11), three children are listed as belong to Lawrence Bankston and Rebecca Hendricks: 1. Peter, born in Philadelphia, died in Georgia; 2. Jacob, 1731-1817; and 3. Daniel, 1733. The compiler provided no references or citations.

page1image43314432 page1image43313088

Page of 9

page2image40998592

Jacob Bankston: son of Lawrence Bankston and Rebecca Hendricks; father of Araminta

  •   On page 18 of Vacher’s manuscript [image 462 of DGS 7814870] says “Their [Lawrence and Rebecca] children: 1. Peter, born in Philadelphia Pa.; died in Georgia, Jacob, born 1731-1817; Daniel, born 1733; [Lawrence] married 2) Ann Major of Virginia, about 1747; their children: 1. Lawrence Jr., born in N.C. 1748-1844 in Georgia; 2. John, born 1750; 3. Richard, born 1752; 4. Andrew, born 1754-1837; 5. Mary, born 1756; all children born in North Carolina.

  •   There is no proof that Lawrence had a second wife named Ann Major and modern researchers are unable to find a woman of this name].

  •   There are so many errors in this, that each child has to be dealt with separately — Vacher provided only one “source” for all this information found here, and it is impossible to distinguish what she is referencing. That “source” is listed as (Genealogical and Historical Society Vol. 3, p. 96) — it has not been identified or found by modern-day researchers of this family.

  •   Starting with the first and foremost problem of this genealogy — the marriage to Elinor Cock (Cox), which is widely quoted and even the National Society of Daughters of American Revolution (NSDAR) accepted it many years ago (back in the 1950s), along with its accepting a John Bankston (b. 6-11-17549-15-1823) as this Jacob’s son (This John married a Henrietta Coates). There are least 13 Ancestor Files at NSDAR utilizing this erroneous information and all that I’ve seen used the same Patriot (Jacob) and the same Child (John), with the birth of Jacob listed as circa 1733. All the DAR papers Ive seen for this Patriot cited Vacher. Many DAR members, of course, used a short form, claiming Jacob as their Patriot and only providing generational links from themselves to wherever the line connected to a John and Jacob.

  •   Being previously accepted by the DAR does not prove or guarantee that any of the information is correct. I belong to the DAR also and am a former registrar for my local chapter. However, as I understand it, the only way to “correct” information that the DAR has is to submit a supplemental ancestor using Jacob and providing the more recent research proof and references. I simply have not had the time or desire to spend $80 on this to do so. But I may at some point.

     More confusion: Since Lawrence and Rebecca, had removed from Pennsylvania (not Philadelphia, by the way) to North Carolina by 1744, why would a purported son named Jacob, return to Philadelphia in 1753 — about 500 miles away — to wed?

     The main problem for researchers to recognize is there was a Jacob Bankston who married an Elinor Cock (Cox), which is cited on the website with thanks to Deborah Myer linking to:

    https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89061958997;view=1up;seq=18

 What has been overlooked by most researchers is that this Jacob Bankson who married in Philadelphia in 1753 is NOT the son of Lawrence Bankston and Rebecca Hendricks. This is a common problem in all genealogies — the assumption that someone of the same name is the same person.

page2image43424896 page2image43423552

Page of 9

page3image40996512

Jacob Bankston: son of Lawrence Bankston and Rebecca Hendricks; father of Araminta

  •   This link above is to a secondary and derivative source — Old Swedes Church Marriage Records compiled from the original records by Park M’Farland, jr. [sic] and published in Philadelphia in 1879 by M’Farland & Son, Printers. On p.10, under 1753, therein under June, it lists: Jacob Bankson [sic] and Elesnore [sic] Cox, by license, 14th June, 1753. This same information can be found in Glori Dei [Old Swedes Church, Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania] Marriages, Baptisms and Burial, 1750-1789, #31, page 11 and on microfilm No. 511,806, Family History Library, Salt Lake City, Utah.

  •   Additional research reveals that the Jacob Bankson who married Elesnore [Elinor] Cox in 1753 is the one who wrote a Will 2 August 1757 and died there 5 August 1757, buried 6 August, aged 37 years [meaning he was born 1720] and additionally, this Jacob and Elinor had no children.

  •   It’s impossible to be an ancestor when there are no descendants.

  •   For proof that the Jacob Bankson who married Elinor Cox in 1753 is the one who died in 1757 and was born, not in 1731 [Vacher], but in 1820see Gloria Dei, Old Swedes Church, Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, Burials, 1750-1878, p. 17 Microfilm No. 511,822, Family History Library, Salt Lake City, Utah. This Jacob Bankson’s Will was written 2 August 1757 and probated 10 August 1757. See FHL microfilm No. 21,724, Wills, Vol. I-K; Will Book K, pp. 557-559 #345 (which has now been digitized and is available at familysearch.org/ DGS 7726374 (image 645). An extract of this Will is also found Ancestry.com:

    Name: Jacob Bankson
    Residence: Philadelphia Co.
    Description: Decedent
    Date: 2 Aug 1757
    Prove Date: 10 Aug 1757
    Title: Yeoman, Jr.
    Book/Page: K:557
    Remarks: Bankson, Jacob, Jr. Co. of Philadelphia. Yeoman. Aug 2, 1757. Aug. 10, 1757. Wife: Elinor. Brothers: Andrew, Peter and John. Sister: Deborah. Mother: Elinor. All relatives are legatees. Exec: Brother John and cousin Andrew Bankson, shopkeeper

    Actually, the Jacob Bankson who died in 1757 in Philadelphia and left a Will, was a son of a John Bankston (1681-1739) — not the son of Lawrence and Rebecca. That Jacob (d. 1757) was a first cousin to Lawrence. This can be determined by examining the names of his relatives mentioned in his Will and studying the more scholarly genealogy prepared by Dr. Peter S. Craig of the Colonial Swedes Society.

     Lawrence Bankston and Rebecca Hendricks did have a son named Jacob, but he was not the Jacob who married an Elinor Cox and who died without issue — and their Jacob was not born in 1731 in Philadelphia.

Page of 9

page4image40899872

Jacob Bankston: son of Lawrence Bankston and Rebecca Hendricks; father of Araminta

From the website:

Jacob married Jemima (maiden name unknown) in North Carolina in 1753.

 Jacob, son of Lawrence (for brevity’s sake), did have a wife named Jemima [—?--] but date and place of their marriage has not been determined. Jemima, his wife, is mentioned in a deed dated 10 February 1798 in Hancock County, Georgia, and in the original minute book of the Mars Hill Baptist Church (Frances W. Reid and Mary B. Warren, Mars Hill Baptist Church (Constituted 1799), Clarke-Oconee Co., Georgia (Athens, Georgia: Heritage Papers, 1966), pp. 1- 4, 9.) appears the names of Jacob Bankston and Jemima Bankston (listed separately under males and females. They were dismissed by letter from this church in 1803.

From the website:

He [Jacob] was a Revolutionary Patriot from Georgia.

 Correct, although Vacher’s claim that he was in the “Georgia Continental Army” is in error. He was in the Militia. The same is true of his brothers — none served in the Continental Army.

From the website:

Information pertaining to Jacob’s grandfather, Andrew Bankson and great-grandparents, Anders Bankson Sr. and Gertrude Rambo is basically accurate.

 However, the nine children listed for Jacob are riddled with misinformation and only four of these nine are proven to be his children, towit: 1. Elijah Bankston (1765-1848, Butts County, Georgia); 2. Henry Bankston (1773-1811, Clarke County, Georgia); 3. Araminta Bankston (1782- 1861, DeKalb County, Georgia); and 4. William Bankston (1767-1807 Clarke County, Georgia) recently proven by DNA.

Note: I, too, started with this old genealogy by Vacher, but when an 1800 Family Bible of Isaac Autry/Awtrey and Araminta Bankston who married that year was found in a descendant’s trunk in the attic, it revealed that my 4-great-grandmother, Araminta Bankston, was the daughter of a Jacob Bankston, and I needed to figure out which one because Vacher claimed, without proof, that there were two Jacobs (father and son) and she gave dates of birth (without any proof ) that they were born in 1731 and 1760.

Hypotheticially either could have fathered my Araminta who was born in 1782.

 I was able to eliminate the childless couple — Jacob Bankston (1720-1757) and Elinor Cock, of Philadelphia, which evidently is the Jacob that Vacher claimed was born in 1731 (again no evidence or any references) — as the parents of my Araminta Bankston’s father, Jacob, or the father of Elijah Bankston because they were childless and in any case had died long before my Araminta was born.

Page of 9

page5image40897168

Jacob Bankston: son of Lawrence Bankston and Rebecca Hendricks; father of Araminta

 I turned to sorting through Georgia records looking for clues and evidence. Three records proved to be most helpful. Two appear in The Early Records of GeorgiaVolume I, Wilkes County. (Abstracted and compiled by Grace Gillam Davidson, published 1933 in Macon, Georgia) and now available online at:
http://www.giddeon.com/wilkes/books/early-records-of-ga-vol 1/index.shtml

  1. There is a 1786 deed in Wilkes County, Georgia, which mentioned that Peter, Daniel and Jacob Bankston sold 400 acres in Pennsylvania, which was “from our father, Laurence Bankston.” (Wilkes County, GA, Deed Book AA — 1785-1787 p. 127.)

  2. This same trio also sold 37.5 acres in Philadelphia, mentioning that it was “willed to our mother, Rebecca Hendricks.” (Wilkes County, GA, Deed Book AA — 1785-1787 p. 125)

  3. On 9 June 1811 in Clarke County, Washington, the following record was recorded regarding a Creek Indian Depredation Claim of 1782 [emphasis mine]:
    “Whereas I Jacob Banckston is about to remove to the Missippi state [sic] this to sertyfy [certify] that I have bargind and sold unto Elijah Banckston, my son all my right[s] and title to the claim that I did againstt the Creek Nations of Indians for property taken at McNabs Fort Wilk[es] County 1782 which property was valued to five hundred and fifty five dollars and I do hereby give over all my right[s] and title to the above mentioned claim unto to above Elijah Banckston or sum written and hereby in power him to Recept for the same in my name and this my order shall recept to whom may be impowerd to pay of [off] the claim. Signed Jacob Banckston.

  •   So, there was a Jacob Bankston who was the son of Lawrence Bankston and Rebecca Hendricks and he had a son, Elijah Bankston, and he planned to leave Georgia for the “Missippi state” [sic] which would have been the Mississippi Territory in 1811 as Mississippi was not yet a state, and he was a candidate as the father of my Araminta Bankston who married in 1800 to Isaac Awtrey.

  •   The Reconstructed 1790 Census of Georgia (De Lamar and Rothstein, 1985) lists only one Jacob Bankston. It had been an early indicator that there might be a problem with the old Vacher genealogy.

  •   Georgia Tax Digests (Volume I-V) cover the years from 1789 to 1817 (“An Index to Georgia Tax Digests” (five volumes) published for the R. J. Taylor Jr. Foundation, Atlanta, GA. The Reprint Co., Publishers, Spartanburg, SC 1986.) And, in order to keep track of the many Bankstons and the numerous counties in which I found them in northeast Georgia during these years, I created a spreadsheet. There were never two Jacob Bankstons listed the same year in these records. My conclusion is there was only one Jacob Bankston, and he was not born in 1731, and he was not

page5image43804224

Page of 9

page6image40899248

Jacob Bankston: son of Lawrence Bankston and Rebecca Hendricks; father of Araminta

the son of the childless Jacob Bankston and Elinor Cox — the Jacob who died in 1757 in Philadelphia.

  •   A thorough search was conducted in pre-1850 Georgia probate, land, and tax records and none turned up a Jacob Bankston Jr. (purportedly born ca 1760).

  •   The designation of Jr. and Sr. does not necessarily indicate son and father; sometimes it was just used to distinguish men of the same name (usually for the benefit of the taxman); they could have been nephew/uncle — or not related at all.

  •   Figuring out where the Jacob Bankston fit into the household of Lawrence Bankston (1704-1771) and Rebecca Hendricks (1710 -before 1786) required some in-depth research and a number of cousins working together.

    How we figured out approximately when this Jacob was born:

  1. His parents, Lawrence Bankston and Rebecca Hendricks were married about 1725-6 in Pennsylvania and lived there first, but by 1744 Lawrence was listed as a taxpayer in Edgecombe County, North Carolina. Land and court records pertaining to Lawrence’s estate reveal that he had five sons, and at least one daughter — she married James Lea.

  2. In a 1793 a deposition of James Lea pertaining to land owned by Lawrence Bankston in Caswell County, North Carolina, he said that Andrew was his (Lawrence’s) eldest son, Peter was the second son, Lawrence (Jr.) was the third, Daniel was the fourth and Jacob was the fifth and youngest son. So now we had the birth order of the five sons.

  3. Children in this time and locality were frequently born about two years apart, so based on the eldest child, probably a daughter, being born within a year after the couple was married, say 1727, this couple (Lawrence Sr. and Rebecca) could have had six children born from ca 1727 to about 1739, using an estimated time frame of about two years between each child (six children x 2 years apart = 12 years). There also is possibly another daughter that researchers believe is part of this family, but critical evidence is lacking.

  4. If Jacob is the youngest child (we only know he is the youngest son) of Lawrence and Rebecca, his date of birth could range from about 1739 to 1743. Of especial interest in figuring out the ages of the sons of Lawrence is the 1755 tax list of Orange County, North Carolina, where is listed Lawrence Bankson [sic], Esq. and sons — 5 white polls. To be counted in the poll, each son had to be 16 years of age or older, which verified that Lawrence had four sons in 1755 — all born before 1739, but his fifth and youngest son, Jacob, evidently was born after 1739 or he would have been included on this tax list.

  5. We also know the birthdate of this Jacob’s son, Elijah (probably his eldest child). It was 1765. [Elijah Bankston’s RW pension application is transcribed and online (under Elijah Bankcston (Bankston) R478) at http://revwarapps.org/

page6image44033024 page6image44033216 page6image44033408 page6image44033600

Page of 9

page7image40897376

Jacob Bankston: son of Lawrence Bankston and Rebecca Hendricks; father of Araminta

  1. Men seldom married before age 21 in this time and locality, so it can estimated that Jacob, son of Lawrence, probably married about 1763, and that he was born about 1740, give or take a couple of years. In making this determination, it also threw serious doubt of the claim that Jacob had a son, Jacob Jr. born in 1760. Biologically, it is possible to be a father at about 20, but highly unlikely in this instance — and no prior marriage has been found for this Jacob. For whatever reason that Vacher assumed there was a Jacob Jr., she provided no evidence whatsoever to support it, and since she was going on the erroneous assumption that the older Jacob was born in 1731 (we do not know how she made that assumption either) it appears to be a “guesstimate” on her part, based on inaccurate information to start with. Apparently, she took the 1753 marriage in Philadelphia and attributed it to Lawrence’s Jacob, but she neglected to find the additional records, which more specifically identify the Jacob who married in 1753.

  2. Additionally, with a more logical birthdate of 1740 for Jacob, son of Lawrence, it throws cold water on Vacher’s other unproven contention that this Jacob had a son, John, born in 1754 — at age 14! That obviously is not likely. (Researchers are working on determining the children of Jacob and Peter, as they both apparently had sons named William and John, but that is research in progress).

The marriage of a Jacob Bankston to a Nancy Brewer in Clarke County, Georgia on 5 October 1808 has caused numerous discussions and many have attempted to make this marriage of a Jacob Bankston Jr., arguing that Jacob Bankston Sr. was TOO OLD. That argument would be credible — IF the correct date of birth of the older Jacob Bankston had been known, but everyone uses the 1731 date given by Vacher (without any evidence) or the 1733 date by DAR (also unproven). But, if this Jacob Bankston was born say 1740-43, a second marriage to a younger woman would not be out of line. After all we have a Jacob found “laying out a road” in 1800 in Georgia, when he would have been (by estimation) 60 years old.

From "The early history of Jackson county, Georgia.
"The writings of the late G.J.N. Wilson . . .
At the June Term of the Inferior Court in 1800, this "Order" was passed: "Ordered, that Gabriel Hubbard, 
Jacob Bankston, James Stringer, Robt. McGowen, Richard Easley, Wm. Loyd and Richard Thurmond be commissioners to lay out a road leading from the High Shoals of the Appalatchee to Jackson court house so as to cross the bridge across the Middle river
where the county may appoint.
"George Wilson, Absalom Ramsey and Jas. Pittman, Judges."

Jacob in Mississippi Territory/Louisiana.

According to the American State Papers, a Jacob Bankston was a claimant of one parcel of land in Baton Rouge Parish Louisiana by settlement in 1806. That date establishes him as a very early settler before land grants or legal records. There was very little actual government. The Spanish were in Baton Rouge

page7image43612992

Page of 9

page8image41002336

Jacob Bankston: son of Lawrence Bankston and Rebecca Hendricks; father of Araminta

but not active. In early 1800s there were many settlement claims that as many as 3 or 4 on one tract] were made by settlement. Some made 75 or more settlement claims. The American State Paper listing Jacob Bankston as a claimant in 1806 was prepared by two land office employees in the St. Helena Parish Land office on 18 Nov. 1820. This list has claimants from 1803 to 1820. The report states, "In relation to the settlements made anteriorly to 15 April, 1813, we conceive it unnecessary to make any remarks. Under the present law they are where fairly made, entitled to donations." [so the actual date of his land claim is open to conjecture, but probably before War of 1812]. When Jacob's claim was recorded it was dated 1820, He was listed with 638.47 acres in Section 49, Township 2 S and Range 9 E. It was also reported that the claim was in St. Tammany not Baton Rouge.

The patent was dated 8-6-1846. In the same Township and Range in Section 44 is George Brewer and in Section 46 is James Lea and in Section 41 is Levi Bankston. Jacob and Levi Bankston's land are adjoining. John Bankston's land is in Township 2 S, Range 8 E. Sections 13, 14, 23, and 24. So their (Jacob and John) land was not adjoining.

Apparently, Jacob returned to Clarke County, Georgia where he is found (with no evidence that he had sold or deeded away any of his property there), particularly in tax records until ca 1815. He appears to be the same man who removed to the Mississippi Territory about (by estimate) 1816-1819, although in 1811 he said he intended to go then (but perhaps the War of 1812 interfered with his plans). He appears to be the one shown in early land records of Louisiana, in Half Moon Baptist Church records of Washington Parish, Louisiana, in the American State Papers claiming land west of Pearl River, Louisiana, and in the 1820 census of Washington Parish, Louisiana.

Information in the Pearl River Baptist Association in Mississippi/Louisiana enables one to learn when Jacob Bankston showed up there. The Abstracts from Minutes of the Mississippi Baptist Association Half Moon Bluff Baptist Church” shows the Delegates to Mississippi Baptist Association starting in 1812. In 1819 and 1820 is listed “N. Morris, (and) J. Bankston.” On 2 February 1822 (p .20) “Chose Brother Jacob Bankston, Moderator.” Jacob Bankston also was a delegate from Half Moon Bluff to Pearl River Association on Sept. 7-9, 1822 and is listed as an ordained minister in list of delegates in 1822. The last mention of him is in these church records is 1823.

In 1820 Washington Parish, Louisiana census, Jacob Bankston is listed with 1 white male 45+ and 1 white female 45+ and 2 white females under 10. Nancy [née Brewer] Bankston is enumerated in the 1830-1840-1850 Washington Parish, Louisiana censuses. Apparently Jacob Bankston died ca 1824-27 (the latter date is when Nancy is referred to as a widow). However, Procession (probate) records for him have not been found in Louisiana; and no probate records have been located in Clarke County, Georgia either.

 Note: The John Bankston, born purportedly about 1754 is not the son of a Jacob, born ca 1740, but rather is the son of Peter Bankston (ca 1732-1804). Peter was Jacob’s older

page8image43168512

Page of 9

page9image40900288

Jacob Bankston: son of Lawrence Bankston and Rebecca Hendricks; father of Araminta

brother and Peter married a Priscilla [?--], who survived him, NOT a Rachel Williams as Vacher claimed, again mixing up the Philadelphia Bankston families with those in North Carolina and Georgia.

 Relying on Ancestry trees is imprudent and irresponsible. Most of them are copied or imported from each other with no real independent research having been conducted and the compilers exhibiting little understanding of the historical documents cited or used. A search of dozens of these trees in which a Jacob Bankston appears (with various birth dates given) reveals almost everyone is copied from whats called Ancestry Family Tree.” An example taken from a tree” pertaining to: Jacob Bankston, born 1760 in Guilford County, NC and who died in 1857 in Washington Parish, Louisiana. The only source” cited is another Ancestry tree, which has no sources either. Heres how it reads:

 When Jacob Bankston and his twin brother Jacob were born in 1760 in Guilford, North Carolina, their father, Jacob, was 29, and their mother, Elsenor, was 26. He had six brothers and five sisters. He died in 1857 in Washington, Louisiana, at the impressive age of 97.

Twins were never (in all of the years Ive been researching) given the exact same name. Moreover, since weve proven that the Jacob who married Elsenor (Elinor) Cox died without heirs in 1757 in Philadelphia; it would be impossible for them to be parents of a child born in 1760 North Carolina.

Because so many inexperienced family historians” especially rely upon Ancestry and FamilySearch (and other online) trees and cite Find-A-Grave as their sources” for their data, it is critical that the Find- A-Grave community endeavor not to post or publish any information that is known to be false or misleading — and to remove same when gross inaccuracies are pointed out. It is impossible for one to know everything about a particular family, but the continued posting of erroneous information is a disservice to all genealogists and historians.

Family trees are never 100% complete or 100% accurate, and as new material is discovered, and DNA results are proving or disproving old links, the flexibility to so note those finds and correct old, inaccurate genealogies at Find-A-Grave is most important to the community.

And we all owe our ancestors the best work we can do.

page9image43557888

Page of 9

Monday, October 18, 2021

1788 Death Date Update James Lea of Kilgore’s Branch

 UPDATE… 1 788 DEATH DATE-

Do not copy or publish without my permission  


JAMES LEA KILGORES BRANCH DEATH DATE 

 

The Rev. Dr. Cynthia Forde

 

I no longer support a death date of 1788 for James Lea of Kilgore’s Branch.  I could not find a source for the death date, so  I began extensive research to discover the origin of the date.  There is no evidence of ANY James Lea dying in 1788, ANYWHERE.   The earliest record discovered for the 1788 date uncovered gross misinformation, beginning with a Sons of the American Revolution membership application dated 1910, as transcribed exactly below.  The original application was perhaps devoid of dates since there was no room on the form for dates of ancestors and the dates that are on the application appear in small print as annotations and appear to have been added after the application was received by the SAR. In The History of Amity County, Albert Eugene Casey assigned that 1788 death date to James Lea of Kilgore’s Branch without any justification and changed the location of his death from TN to Caswell County, NC... !  Apparently since so many people had used that date, he couldn’t bring himself to throw it away, even though it is entirely without merit.  Herewith the research report: 

 

SAR MEMBERSHIP # 21244 [1]

 

James Everett Lea, Jr. a student from Huron, Mississippi, filed an application for membership in the Sons of the American Revolution on 12 May1910 based on the military record of James Lea, Jr. of Orange County, North Carolina.  His application was approved on 12 May 1910.  The petition sent to the Mississippi Registrar General May 18,1910.  Certificate of Membership  #21244 was delivered 25 July 1910. The file was transferred to D.C. #9080 (1934). 

 

APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP

TO THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF

MISSISSIPPI SOCIETY 

…OF THE…

 

SONS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION

 

 

I, James E. Lea, Jr, being of the age of twenty-one-years and upwards, to wit, of the age of (twenty-one) hereby apply for membership in the society by right of lineal descent in the following line from James Lea, Jr. who was born in North Carolina on the 21 May 1752, (replaced by 1718).  And died in Tennessee on the 18 Jan 1790 (replaced by June 1788) and who assisted in obtaining American Independence.

 

I was born in Huron in the County of Amite, State of Mississippi on the 23 day of Jan 1888.

 

I am the son of James E. Lea  and 

Maggie Tate Lea his wife, and 

 

Grandson of James E. Lea  b. 7/28/1819   d. 4/25/1878   m. 1826 and

Frances Powell Lea  b. 8/22/1827   d. 2/12/1886 his wife, and 

 

Great-grandson of Zachariah Lea  b. 1/15/1776   d. 2/5/1815   m. 1/19/1802  and 

            Sabrina Muse Day Lea   b. 1/14/1783   d. 8  his wife, and

 

Great-great grandson of Luke Lea  b. 12/26/1739  d.  m. and 

            Elizabeth Wilson Lea  b. 11/26/1739 his wife, and 

 

Great-great-great grandson of James Lea, Jr.   (1718-1788)  and

            No record 

 

Great-great- great-great grandson of James Lea, Sr.  and

            No record 

 

And he, the said ancestor, James Lea, Jr is the ancestor who assisted in establishing American Independence, while acting as a private soldier in the North Carolina Militia

 

Ancestors Service

 

My ancestor’s services in assisting in the establishment of American Independence during the War of the Revolution were as follows:  

 

Served under his brother Gabriel Lea who was captain of a company from Orange County, North Carolina.  They watched the enemy and aided Americans by getting supplies.  Served under General Griffith Rutherford after July 23 1776 against the Cherokee Indians of East Tennessee.  In the valley of the Tennessee River they burned the Indian towns of Natauga, Ellajay, and Estakoe, and routed the Indians at where Franklin, NC now stands, with the aid of General Williamsons troops from South Carolina subdued the Indians and returned home in October 1776.  James Lea fought again with General Rutherford on the 20th of June, 1780 at Ramsours Mill against the Tories.  Two of the officers were Col. Francis Locke and Major David Wilson of NC.  Later James served as a private under Capt. Robert Raiford and Col. Abraham Shepherd of the 10th Continental NC Regiment enlisting Sept 18, 1780 for eighteen months and served throughout the siege of Yorktown, VA.  For another record of the services of James Lea see North Carolina Records by Justice Walter Clark, Vol. XVI, p.  1106.  It is also said that James fought in some of the battles of South Carolina, but we have no record of service. The surname in some instances is written Lee.  

 

In getting the above data, I have consulted my older relatives, family records, and a genealogist.  My ancestor, James Lea, Sr came from England to Virginia after 1708.  His son lived in North Carolina and his grandson in Tennessee.  Zachariah Lea came from Tenn in 1802 and settled the plantation where we live, which makes this about the only place in Miss where ancestors for over 100 yrs. have lived. 

 

The following are references for the above statements:

 

Mrs. Chas. Fairfax-Henley, Miss,  Tenn

Mr. James Everett Lea, Sr Huron, Miss

Mr. Winchester Everett, Glading, Miss

Mr. Chas Jefferson Thomas, Peoria Miss

 

Signed James Everett Lea, Jr.

Mississippi, Amite County 

 

 

A close-up of a watch

Description automatically generated with low confidence

National Society, Sons of the American Revolution

 

 

According to Dennis Simpson, an official researcher at the DAR Library in Washington, D.C., the first application to the DAR naming James Lea as a patriot was accepted on 15 April 1911.

 

The second DAR applicant was Frances Powell Otken, probably a first cousin of James Everett Lea, that first SAR applicant.

 

The DAR has had 105 applications for membership based on the service of James Lea.  The first 65 were descendants of his son Luke Lea, and the first 85 declared the service to be as a private and the death date to be 1788, according to a printout found among the two hundred sixty-five pages of data provided by the DAR as the entirety of their files concerning James Lea.  All 105 applications were for descendants of James Lea of Country Line Creek, the father of Luke Lea as proved by his will and probate record in 1792.  The inventory was recorded in 1792, proving that his death occurred in 1792, not 1788. 

 

About eighty-five of the one hundred and five DAR applicants cite the SAR military record for James Lea, Jr. who died in Tennessee in 1788 for their Revolutionary War Patriot.  We believe that the only contemporary James Lea who named a son James Lea was the James Lea who lived on Kilgore's Branch in Caswell County, NC.  The one DAR application for James Lea, Sr. of Kilgore’s Branch was rejected.  

 

In 1777 a petition was circulated for the formation of Caswell County.  Four of the signers were named James Lea.  There were James Lea of Country Line Creek whose father is unknown, James Lea son of William Lea of Cobbs Creek, and James Lea of Kilgore’s Branch and his son James Lea.  No wonder that descendants in Mississippi, and their genealogist, one hundred and thirty years later were confused and mistook the James Lea who performed military service for their ancestor.  Bear in mind that Luke Lea was born in 1739, so James Lea of Country Line Creek would have been born no later than 1718 and therefore be 60 plus years old in 1778.  It is hard to imagine that a 60-year-old would survive service as a private in the war.  The DAR now accepts James Lea of Country Line Creek as an approved patriot based on supplies that he provided to the American cause, and his service as a Grand Juror in 1769.

 

In The History of Amity County, Albert Eugene Casey assigned that 1788 death date to James Lea of Kilgore’s Branch without any justification and changed the location of his death from TN to Caswell County, NC... !  Apparently since so many people had used that date, he couldn’t bring himself to throw it away, even though it is entirely without merit.  We still know nothing about the son of James Lea of Kilgore’s Branch who was named James Lea and moved to Tennessee early according to Lorenzo Lea’s Genealogy of the Lea Family (never published).

 

In summary, we still don’t know the origin of that 2 Jun 1788 death date and now we also don’t know the origin of the birth date of 21 May 1752 and death date of 18 Jan 1790 as recorded on the original SAR application.

 

 

The Rev. Dr. Cynthia Forde

PO Box 598

Hempstead, Texas 77445



[1] Source Citation

Volume: 107

Source Information

Ancestry.com. U.S., Sons of the American Revolution Membership Applications, 1889-1970 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011.

Original data: Sons of the American Revolution Membership Applications, 1889-1970. Louisville, Kentucky: National Society of the Sons of the American Revolution. Microfilm, 508 rolls.

 



Warning: The following may not apply to James Lea of Kilgore's Branch, but the records may indicate he was still living post 1788]:

[note: While James Lea, Jr. was known to be living in Tennessee, the following transactions occurred)

25 Jun 1792: James Lea sold to Samuel Nealey 200 acres on South Hico adjacent Samuel Johnston and James Johnston, Cooper, Huston. [James Lea, Jr. was living in Tennessee.]

1 Feb 1793: James Lea sold to Richard Hamblet 148 acres on Kilgore’s Branch of North Hico, adjacent Kilgore. Gabriel Lea witnessed.

24 Nov 1795: Gloucester County Records: James Lea, a neighbor to Baylor Bird, who sold land to James Sargent, Sr. Other neighbors were William Stewart, Joseph Neeley, John Wisdom, Henry Fuller, Jr., Thomas Phelps. [Last mention of James Lea in Gloucester County area; Gabriel, William, and Lawrence Lea continued to appear in land records there.]

In Gloucester District, there were two James Leas mentioned in the deeds in 1782, 1783 and 1784, designated Jr. and Sr., which does not necessarily mean they were father and son. These may have been the same two James Leas mentioned in St. Lawrence District, as these areas were very close. Cobb’s Creek of St. Lawrence District appears from the map to have been just a ‘stone’s throw’ from the Kilgore Creek area of Gloucester District.

1790 U.S. Federal Census, Gloucester District, Caswell County, NC
Appearing on this list: James Lea, Gabriel Lea, Thomas Kilgore [The James Lea who lived near Gabriel Lee in 1800 was also between twenty-six and forty-five, too young to be the same who gave the deposition; James Lea, son of “Kilgore” was living in Tennessee.

1798: Alexander Rose Bible,  Inscription: Jas Lea, died. April 6, 179?   We have  hired forensic handwriting analysts to decipher the last digit of that date.  The numbers that cannot fit into the space are 1, 2, 4, 7, 9.  We believe it is is the digit 8, thereby making that date 1798. 


Sources:

[1] Documents: Betty Fitzgerald, The Descendants of James Lea of Kilgore's Branch, Research Report.

[2] Katherine Kerr Kendall, "Caswell County "Heritage", by K. K. Kendall, #437 & #437A

[3] Document 3: Raquel Lindaas, Lea Family Research, 2005, 2006, The Rev. Dr. Cynthia Vold Forde

[4] Caswell County Historical Society Website, E-mail communication with Rick Fredrick. [http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=caswellcounty&id=I01641]

[5] Ben L. Rose, Report of Research on the Lea Family in Virginia & North Carolina Before 1800, [1984] at 124-125.

[6] Document 14: Dr. A. B. Pruitt, Abstracts of Land Entries: Caswell Co., NC, 1778-1795, 1841-1863, and Person Co., NC, 1792-1795 [Raleigh: p. p., 1990].

[7] Document 8: Ben Lacy Rose, Alexander Rose of Person County, North Carolina and His Descendants [Richmond: Carter Composition, 1979].

Friday, September 10, 2021

LIES AND 100 ACRES

WHY LIE? WHY?

It is Only 100 Acres!

The Rev. Dr. Cynthia Forde


Why would a genealogist lie?  I was deeply disappointed after being confronted with lies about something so unimportant as 100 acres of land!  A genealogist's credibility and reputation is at stake.  

 lesson to remember is that the first draft of history very often is a lie, and it's not an accidental lie, it's intentional. Partisans understand that history is among other things, a tool and they can use it to accumulate power. So they lie about something to suit their ends, they keep lying about it and before long, their lies are recorded as truth. They're on Wikipedia, and your kids believe them. 

Herewith, the circumstances about the 100 acres: William Lea of Mattaponi, possibly of King and Queen County, NC left 25 acres or (35 acres per the abstract) to a man named James Lea of Caswell County, NC who hired an attorney to obtain the 25 or 35 acres.   All we know of this William Lea is that he owned the 100 acres described in Book B, Page 36, Caswell County Records, State of North Carolina (Lea, William, Caswell County Historical Association.) 

Because James Lea of Caswell County, NC applied to obtain 25 acres of this property it gave rise to the mystery of what happened to the other 75 acres.  Were the 100 acres divided into four parts of 25 acres each?  Or was 25 acres all that was left of the 100 acres?  

There are folks who claim there are deed records for the 100 acres.  There are NO deed records for any portion of the 100 acres.  None. Not one. NO, there are no deeds in the estate settlement of James Sargent, nor are there deed records in the Deeds of Caswell County, or in the book, Heritage of Caswell County. Nor are there deed records to show a widow of James Lea, Jr. sold his 25 acres.  NO, NOT ONE.  

Now comes the following article by Betty Fitzgerald, who did her research very recently, claiming in the Caswell blog that she found the disposition of the 25 acres that went to James Lea of Caswell County, in the estate of his son's (James Lea, Jr.) widow, Elizabeth of Giles County, TN.  Now mind you, this was recent research in the past five years and total fabrication.  

James Lea who died in Giles County before 1830, when widow Elizabeth sold the inherited 25 acres on Mattaponi Creek in King and Queen County:

This appears to be a complete fabrication.  A search of the index to deeds of Giles County from 1810 to 1895 did not reveal any sales or purchases by Elizabeth Lea or Lee.  James Lee was noted with one deed of sale only, in Book B, page 5.  On April 14, 1812, James Lee (also spelled Lea in the same deed) of Caswell County, North Carolina appointed John Yancy of Giles County as his agent to sell sixty acres in Wilson County on Jenings Fork of Round Lick Creek, to any person who may think proper to purchase it.[1]  The sixty acres was part of a 640 acre claim, but the exact manner by which James came into possession of it does not show.  James also authorized John Yancy to obtain a duplicate warrant for the remaining 580 acres of the claim.

A check of the Wilson County abstracts of deeds reveals that James Lea of Caswell County, North Carolina sold sixty acres on Round Lick Creek to Isaiah Coe on August 26, 1814.[2]

Various sources online quote this claim that Elizabeth Lea, widow of James Lea, sold twenty-five acres on Mattaponi Creek in King and Queen County, the deed recorded in Giles County.  The only source reference that could be found was the very vague “Court Documents”.  Court records of Giles County are not abstracted into print as early as 1830, so a page by page search of the microfilmed originals ensued.  It turns out that a gap in the originals from 1829 to 1833 exists.  Another filming of county court records has a gap between 1825 to 1833.  Scrolling page by page did not reveal any such entry, but with those gaps, searching the year 1830 was not possible. [cf: Research will be conducted in Giles County, TN March 2012]

Searches for a corresponding deed or court entry in King and Queen County were thwarted by the loss of records there.  No deeds have survived before 1864.  Court minute books begin in 1858, and chancery orders in 1831.  Validating or negating such a sale of twenty-five acres is conveniently impossible, unless further clarification can be unearthed.

It appears clear that James Lea returned to Caswell County by 1812, and that Elizabeth was not his widow.  It is also clear that she did not sell land in Virginia.  A James Lee paid taxes in Wilson County in 1804, but why was the Power of Attorney for the sale of that land recorded in Giles County?  Was it simply because John Yancy resided there?   

A very recent posting in RootsWeb’s WorldConnect Project tells that John Graves Yancy (1764-1818) was born in Orange County, North Carolina, and died in Giles County, Tennessee.  He married Elizabeth Lightfoot Moore in Caswell County, North Carolina on February 24, 1789, and they moved from Caswell County to Giles County around 1810.[3]  James must have known him in Caswell County, or even been related to him.  

Printed abstracts of other Giles County records do not mention James Lea or Lee.  Elizabeth Lea appears in the 1830 census there.  It appears that she was the female head of household age forty to fifty with young adult children.  A female age eighty to ninety also lived in the home, too old to be the mother of the young adult children.[4]

The 1820 census shows Elizabeth Lee in Giles County, with a female in each of the five columns.  She may be the one in the 26-45 age group.  An Edward Lee is listed three names above her, age sixteen to twenty-six.[5]  The 1820 census is the earliest federal census available for that part of Tennessee.  The printed census index does not show any James Leas, but a few James Lees resided in Davidson, Overton, Smith and Stewart Counties.  Of the Lees in Giles County, there was Elizabeth and Edward, also a Daniel and a William, all with the Lee spelling.[6]

As a substitute for the missing 1810 census, a reconstructed census has been created from other types of records, spanning 1809 to 1811.  In those years, a James Lea appeared in court minutes in Anderson County, and another James Lea received a military commission in Hawkins County.  A James Lee paid taxes in Davidson County in 1811, and in Sumner County in 1810, by an agent.  The only mention of a Lea or Lee in Giles County was John Lee, who served as a juror, as per court records there.[7]  It may be that James Lea of Jefferson County had already returned to North Carolina by 1810, or he just didn’t appear in any county records around that time.  

Printed abstracts of Giles County court minutes reveal that Elizabeth Lee was the widow of John Lee, most likely the same John Lee who served as a juror there in 1810.  In the March 1815 session of court, Elizabeth Lee and William Lee were granted Letters of Administration on the estate of John Lee, deceased.  ‘Alizabeth’ Lee, widow of John Lee, was allotted a “sufficient portion of stock & provisions as will maintain her & her children if any for one year from date of her husband’s decease.”  John Yancy was noted in the records as guardian for some Graves children, but no association between him and the Lee family there could be detected.[8]

The 1810 census of North Carolina shows three James Leas in Caswell County, and two in Person County.  Interestingly, one of the carried the middle name of ‘Yancy’, but was only sixteen to twenty-six years old.  Determining which one of these, if any, might have been the same who lived in eastern Tennessee would be very difficult, if he had indeed returned by then.

In summary, it seems clear that James Lea of Greene, Jefferson and Hawkins Counties is all the same person.  He obtained many large parcels of land in those counties, and apparently in Wilson County, as well.  He was an active member of the community in Greene and Jefferson Counties, but sold off most of his land and returned to Caswell County by 1812 or [cf: Note: Amite County, Mississippi]  What he did not dispose of before he returned to North Carolina, he appointed John Yancy of Giles County as his agent to sell land in Wilson County.  No sale of twenty-five acres of inherited land in on Mattaponi Creek in King and Queen County by Elizabeth Lea could be found.  No evidence that James Lea ever resided in Giles County can be found.

 

For Rev. Cynthia Forde,

Raquel Lindaas, AG®

Heritage Consulting




[1] Document 20: Deeds, Giles County, Tennessee, Book B, p. 5. FHL Film #0968853

[2] Document 21: Thomas E. Partlow, Wilson County, Tennessee Deed Books C-M, 1793-1829 (Easley, SC: Southern Historical Press, 1984). FHL Call #976.854 R2pt

[3] Document 22: “Caswell County Family Tree”, RootsWeb’s WorldConnect Project, Entry #59769, 20 Jan 2012.

[4] Document 23: Ancestry.com, U. S. Federal Census 1830, Giles County, Tennessee, p. 197.

[5] Document 24: Ancestry.com, U. S. Federal Census 1820, Pulaski, Giles County, Tennessee, p. 8.

[6] Document 25: Elizabeth Petty Bentley, Index to the 1820 Census of Tennessee (Baltimore: Clearfield Co., 2001). FHL Call #976.8 X22b

[7] Document 26: Charles A. Sherrill, The Reconstructed 1810 Census of Tennessee (Mt. Juliet, TN: privately published, 2001). FHL Call #976.8 X2s

[8] Document 27: Carol Wells, Abstracts of Giles County, Tennssee: County Court Minutes, 1813-1816 and Circuit Court Minutes, 1810-1816 (Bowie, MD: Heritage Books, 1995). FHL Call #976.861 P28wc